Skip to main content

Table 1 Clinical outcomes of patients with PD at pre-, mid-, and post-training

From: Postural control learning dynamics in Parkinson’s disease: early improvement with plateau in stability, and continuous progression in flexibility and mobility

Clinical measure

PD patients (n = 20)

ANOVA

P value

(F value)

Effect size

Tukey P value for post-hoc comparisons

Change pattern

Pre-training

Mid-training

Post-training

Pre to mid

Mid to post

Pre to post

Functional balance

 Functional reach test (cm)

23.5 ± 7.9

32.8 ± 6.7*

37.6 ± 6.1*

< 0.0001 (43.1)

0.694

<0.0001

<0.0005

<0.0001

Continuous

 Step test (taps in 15 s)

13.2 ± 3.5

15.9 ± 4.0*

17.3 ± 3.6*

< 0.0001 (23.9)

0.557

<0.0001

0.063

<0.0001

Saturation

 Tinetti balance score

14.7 ± 1.5

15.6 ± 0.9*

15.9 ± 0.2*

< 0.0005 (9.44)

0.332

0.033

0.320

0.011

Saturation

 Tandem stancea—EO (s)

93.0 ± 27.6

113.7 ± 12.6*

118.3 ± 5.7*

< 0.0001 (14.5)

0.433

0.003

0.141

0.002

Saturation

 Tandem stancea—EC (s)

35.4 ± 26.8

54.8 ± 29.1*

72.7 ± 30.2*

< 0.0001 (23.2)

0.549

0.004

0.012

< 0.0001

Continuous

Functional mobility

 TUG (s)

9.1 ± 2.7

7.4 ± 1.6*

6.5 ± 1.4*

< 0.0001 (23.5)

0.553

0.0007

0.004

0.0001

Continuous

 6MWT (m)

226.0 ± 67

254.1 ± 61*

305.5 ± 62*

< 0.0001 (19.8)

0.510

0.040

0.002

0.0001

Continuous

 Tinetti gait score

10.5 ± 1.4

11.5 ± 0.6*

11.8 ± 0.4*

< 0.0001 (13.8)

0.422

0.009

0.005

0.001

Continuous

  1. Values are reported as mean ± standard deviation
  2. EO, eyes open; EC, eyes closed; TUG, Timed Up and Go test; 6MWT, Six-minute walk test; FRT, Functional reach test; Continuous, continuously improving with significant difference between all time points; Saturation, improvements with saturation at the end—i.e., significant change in the first half of the training (from pre- to mid-training), but then non-significant from mid- to post-training points
  3. Post-hoc Tukey tests for pairwise comparisons between time points: *significantly different from pre-training (P < 0.05); significantly different from mid-training (P < 0.05)
  4. Significant P values are in italic
  5. aTimed tandem stance was performed with the right and left leg in the front position, and then the time of both legs was summed as one scale (with maximum score of 120 s, considering that the maximum time to complete each stance test was set to 60 s)