Skip to main content

Table 5 Performance results based on test data using four classifiers: KNN, logistic regression, SVM, random forest

From: Automated chest screening based on a hybrid model of transfer learning and convolutional sparse denoising autoencoder

Classifier

Data augmentation

Precision

Recall

F1

AUC

KNN

Without augmentation

0.73

0.58

0.64

0.753

0.87

0.93

0.9

SMOTE

0.44

0.84

0.58

0.752

0.93

0.67

0.78

Positive augmentation

0.57

0.68

0.62

0.758

0.89

0.68

0.87

4× augmentation

0.57

0.84

0.62

0.758

0.89

0.89

0.87

Logistic

Without augmentation

0.76

0.54

0.63

0.744

0.87

0.95

0.91

SMOTE

0.61

0.82

0.64

0.79

0.92

0.76

0.84

Positive augmentation

0.57

0.66

0.61

0.754

0.89

0.84

0.86

4× augmentation

0.63

0.72

0.67

0.792

0.91

0.87

0.89

SVM

Without augmentation

0.63

0.73

0.68

0.798

0.91

0.86

0.89

SMOTE

0.63

0.77

0.69

0.813

0.92

0.86

0.89

Positive augmentation

0.59

0.64

0.61

0.75

0.88

0.86

0.87

4× augmentation

0.61

0.71

0.66

0.784

0.9

0.86

0.88

Random forest

Without augmentation

0.69

0.38

0.49

0.663

0.83

0.95

0.88

SMOTE

0.62

0.5

0.56

0.704

0.85

0.9

0.88

Positive augmentation

0.54

0.63

0.58

0.73

0.88

0.83

0.85

4× augmentation

0.59

0.54

0.56

0.71

0.86

0.88

0.87