From: Active lower limb prosthetics: a systematic review of design issues and solutions
Type | Name of prosthesis, Institute, Country | Year | Reference |
---|---|---|---|
A/K | Agonist–antagonist active knee prosthesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA | 2008 | [56] |
A/K | University of Sakarya, Adapazari, Turkey | 2008 | [55] |
A/K | Waterloo Active Prosthetic Knee, University of Waterloo, Canada | 2008 | [29] |
A/K | Hebei University of Technology, China | 2010 | [49] |
A/K | ETH Zurich, Switzerland | 2011 | [72] |
A/K | The University of Alabama, USA | 2011 | [73] |
A/K | Department of Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering, USA | 2012 | [53] |
A/K | University of Rhode Island, USA | 2012 | [74] |
B/K | Bionic ankle–foot prosthesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA | 2006 | [58] |
B/K | SPARKy, Arizona State University, USA | 2008 | [75] |
B/K | IPAM (intelligent Prosthesis using Artificial Muscles), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium | 2008 | [28] |
B/K | Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium | 2009 | [46] |
B/K | PANTOE 1, Peking University, China | 2010 | [57] |
B/K | Marquette University, Milwaukee, USA | 2010 | [76] |
B/K | Kanazawa Institute of Technology, Ishikawa, Japan | 2011 | [77] |
B/K | AMP-foot 2.0, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium | 2012 | [78] |
B/K | Vanderbilt Transtibial Prosthesis, Vanderbilt University, USA | 2013 | [32] |
A/K + B/K | Vanderbilt Transfemoral Prosthesis, Vanderbilt University, USA | 2009 | [59] |
A/K + B/K | University of Brasília, Brasil | 2009 | [79] |
A/K + B/K | SmartLeg, University of Mostar, Bosnia and Herzegovina | 2011 | [34] |
A/K + B/K | Cyberleg alpha, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium | 2013 | [80] |