Strategies for optimizing the phase correction algorithms in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance spectroscopy

Table 3 The statistics of location (mean) and dispersion (standard deviation and coefficient of variation) for relative phase error [%] obtained for phase correction algorithms before the application of tuning procedures - high noise.

Δφ	Automics			Shanon's			Ernst			Dispa			eDispa
	$\bar{x}$	s	CV [%]	$\bar{x}$	s	CV [%]	$\bar{x}$	s	CV [%]	$\bar{x}$	s	CV [%]	$\bar{x}$	s	CV [%]
5.00	12.25	1.61	13.14	10.25	1.75	17.07	5.67	1.55	27.34	8.03	1.88	23.41	8.55	2.05	23.98
7.50	12.29	1.64	13.30	10.46	1.86	17.74	5.75	1.62	28.09	8.09	2.04	25.17	8.62	2.09	24.19
10.00	12.33	1.66	13.47	10.56	1.83	17.36	5.79	1.75	30.22	8.13	1.95	24.04	8.78	2.39	27.26
12.50	12.38	1.64	13.27	10.64	1.78	16.75	5.96	1.76	29.45	8.26	1.99	24.10	9.55	2.52	26.33
15.00	12.42	1.64	13.23	10.71	1.76	16.42	6.19	1.78	28.81	8.34	1.98	23.69	10.12	2.55	25.24
17.50	12.47	1.65	13.25	10.82	1.76	16.26	6.32	1.84	29.14	8.42	2.00	23.76	10.51	2.68	25.49
20.00	12.51	1.65	13.19	10.88	1.69	15.57	6.48	1.89	29.23	8.51	1.94	22.76	11.12	2.87	25.78
22.50	12.57	1.62	12.89	10.93	1.65	15.05	6.78	1.83	26.99	8.66	2.01	23.21	12.13	2.80	23.04
25.00	12.61	1.65	13.08	10.97	1.66	15.13	7.09	1.89	26.66	8.67	1.92	22.15	12.39	2.71	21.87

ISSN: 1475-925X